Editor's note: Don't skip this article just because you may not have a
lawn to turn into a veggie patch. Mosko provides fabulous background,
such as the post-WWII development that "chemical weapons
manufacturers funneled stockpiles of compounds used for making
poisonous gases and explosives into making pesticides and nitrogen
fertilizers." Southern California remains a crazy place, so let's hope
Mosko is heard: "The energy required for desalination far exceeds that
for water importation." - JL
Which consumes more fossil fuels, lawn maintenance with gas-powered
tools or lawn watering?
For residents of Southern California, the
correct answer is watering because of the energy it takes to transport
water to the region.
Southern California (SoCal) is a semi-arid desert. Rainfall averages
only 15 inches per year, for example, in the Los Angeles area. Local
water sources have fallen far short of meeting the region’s water
needs for more than a century.
sprinklers next to pavement
With 2/3 of the state’s rainfall in Northern California and 2/3 of the
water demand in SoCal, the State deals with this imbalance by pumping
in half of SoCal’s water supply from sources hundreds of miles away,
the Colorado River and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
The Water-Electricity Relationship
Piping water long distances is costly in terms of electricity,
especially water imported from the Delta which has to be pumped uphill
2,000 ft to get over the Tehachapi Mountains.
In a first ever analysis of the energy embedded in bringing potable
water to residential faucets and hoses in SoCal, a 2005 Calif Energy
Commission analysis calculated 11,111 kWh/MG (kilowatt hours per
million gallons), three times costlier than in Northern California.
Most of the electricity is for water transportation, much less for
water treatment and maintaining water pressure. Every 100 gallons of
imported water eats up enough electricity to keep a 100 W bulb lit for
11 hours.
California and the Colorado River are both in the grip of prolonged
droughts, and water imports to SoCal from the Delta have been
curtailed because of environmental problems there. SoCal’s water
reserves, already at near critical levels, are projected to dwindle
further with population growth.
In November 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger signed a package of reform
bills which included plans to restore the Delta ecosystem and mandate
a statewide reduction of 20% per capita water use by 2020. While
these measures might improve the reliability of water supplies in the
future, the onus for achieving conservation is placed on water
suppliers with no specific pressure on the public to curb wasteful
water practices.
According to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
(MWD), up to 70% of residential water use in SoCal is for outdoor
irrigation, and lawns are a principle consumer. Domestic water use in
California averages 124 gal/day/person, exceeding the national average
by over 25 gal based on U.S. Geological Survey data. Although the
number of lawns in California is unknown, 84% of respondents in a year
2000 statewide Air Resources Board survey described having a lawn
area, and the San Diego Union recently reported an estimate that
residential lawns cover 300,000 acres and annually soak up 1.5 million
acre-feet of water.
The most popular grasses in SoCal are fescues which generally require
one inch of water per week during dry months and mowing about every
other week. This means that modest-sized lawn areas (25 ft x 25 ft) in
both front and back yards could consume, in a single month, in excess
of 3,000 gallons of water plus the 34 kWh of electricity required to
get it there.
In comparison, gas-powered mowing, weed-whacking and edging this same
lawn for a month would use about 1/6 the energy equivalent (~6 kWh or
0.2 gallons gas) according to Paul Tukey, founder of SafeLawns.org, a
Maine-based non-profit dedicated to minimizing the environmental
impact of lawn care. Lawn tools are also significant sources of smog
and carbon monoxide.
Lawns consume additional fossil fuels by way of nitrogen fertilizers
and synthetic pesticides which are derivatives of natural gas and
petroleum. Cornell University professor David Pimentel has estimated
that producing the nitrogen in a 40-lb bag of fertilizer with 30%
nitrogen content consumes the energy equivalent of one gallon of gas.
Lawn chemicals also pollute local waters supplies.
Given the environmental downsides of lawn maintenance, how is it that
lawns became a standard feature of the American home, even in arid
SoCal?
History of the American Lawn
The ideal of a sweeping green lawn was borrowed from wealthy English
estates where groundskeepers were hired to hand-cut the grass with
scythes. Before the industrial revolution, the typical American yard
was hard-pack dirt spotted with edible or medicinal plants. Native
American grasses were ill-suited to mimic the image of the uniformly
green English lawn.
In the early 20th century, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S.
Golf Association collaborated to develop grass strains that could
flourish in American climates although they required hauling water in
buckets. The availability of garden hoses and push mowers made lawn
maintenance less arduous, but lawns did not become commonplace until
the American Garden Club successfully campaigned to reframe the well-
manicured lawn as a civic duty.
The close of WWII ushered in the era of modern lawn care. Cheap
engines for gas-power mowers became available, and chemical weapons
manufacturers funneled stockpiles of compounds used for making
poisonous gases and explosives into making pesticides and nitrogen
fertilizers.
Water Saving Solutions
Local nurseries offer free classes on drought resistant gardening for
those willing to downsize lawn areas and replace with plantings better
suited to SoCal’s climate. Also, the MWD, through its SoCal Water$mart
program, is offering rebates for swapping out grass areas for
artificial turf.
Switching to less water-thirsty grasses, like buffalograss, and
installing water-saving sprinkler nozzles and weather-smart irrigation
controllers – which also qualify for Water$mart rebates – is another
way to cut down on water consumption.
Residents of Carlsbad and Huntington Beach are currently wrestling
over whether large proposed ocean desalination plants at these sites
are viable solutions to the region’s water shortage. From an energy
perspective at least, desalination makes little sense: The energy
required for desalination far exceeds that for water importation,
according to the California Energy Commission.
Through public education, the yard lawn should go the way of cigarette
smoking: once a status symbol but now little tolerated. Helping SoCal
residents see the absurdity in wasting precious water and energy on
lawn care might go a long way to establishing a culture of individual
responsibility and conservation that could make drastic measures like
desalination unnecessary.
Outside of community parks, golf courses and the like, lawns really
have no place in SoCal.
* * * * *
Editor's anecdotes: Years ago a national magazine advertisement by Chevron showed before-and-after pictures of lawns, the first one without the use of lawn chemical, and the second after the use of the petrochemical. The only difference was that the first one had a lot of yellow dots for dandelion flowers. This was supposed to be bad or unsightly, whereas the plant is not only medicinal and nutritious but beautiful. How offensive, I thought.
For the Arcata, Humboldt town square that has been under much discussion year in, year out, the publisher/editor of the local weekly newspaper utilized a graphics program to create a front page bird's eye view of supposed plans by activists' for a car-free plaza. His rendition made the area look completely green, to the edge of every building, as in a huge lawn. No provision for handicap access, walkways or emergency-vehicle access was even hinted at. This set back the car-free-plaza efforts of the Transportation Safety Committee for the city on which I sat, in 1997-98. The town's citizens have wanted a car-free plaza for decades but never seem to get it, due to certain merchants' influence on the City Council. Nice green lawn? -- no thanks.
For one lawn I had in "cAr"cata," I planted root crops, thinking they would be safer to eat than above ground food getting the brunt of car exhaust. The potatoes and parsnips came up fine, and helped launch Food Not Lawns (there's a book available by that name) - Arcata faction. Interestingly, the parsnip plants formed a glorious high and thick hedge of the most intense green. I can still picture my lovely tree-sitter housemate who took her nude sunbaths behind that hedge of parsnips.
- JL
See original web appearance of the above article at boogiegreen.com
Culture Change mailing address: P.O. Box 3387, Santa Cruz, California, 95063, USA, Telephone 1-215-243-3144 (and fax). Culture Change was founded by Sustainable Energy Institute (formerly Fossil Fuels Policy Action), a nonprofit organization.
Some articles are published under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. See Fair Use Notice for more information.