Petroleum-based plastics have only in the last several years been discovered to be an unmitigated disaster. Oceans are being filled with this mess of nonbiodegradable poison that cannot be cleaned up. Plastics, their additives and toxins attached to them in the oceans enter our bodies and damage our hormones and genes. So, is it agroplastics to the rescue?
The term agroplastics should be adopted over bioplastics, following the example of anti-agrofuels activists who object to "biofuels." The agribusiness process of growing crops for fuel production is very similar in intent and agricultural practices for growing crops for plastics. The main objections to both are the following, based on my petroleum-industry knowledge and the common concern for soil, water and life forms harmed by petrochemicals and unsustainable land use:
- Monocrops of corn, for example, are usually genetically modified organisms (GMO) that are designed mainly to tolerate great quantities of petroleum herbicide and pesticide.
- This means huge quantities of the chemicals are sold by the maker, such as Monsanto, in order to kill all other species in the field.
- As with non-GMO crops, massive amounts of natural-gas based fertilizer are involved for agrofuels and agroplastics. This is part of the embedded energy of foods and agricultural products that aren't sustainably produced.
- The poison residues in the surviving, intended crop (or biomass that's not necessarily food for humans or animals), to be eaten or burned or refined, are therefore very high or higher than non-GMO crops' residues.
- Soil depletion is ongoing, along with nitrogen oxide released as a greenhouse gas (through tilling, a problem in "organic" farming too). The problem is exacerbated if "waste" crop residues are removed, depriving the soil of replenishing itself. (See our report "Peak Soil", link below).
- The agrofuel ethics (or lack thereof) regarding the appropriation of food resources-for-fuel -- driving up food prices that have thus become linked to oil prices -- are the same for agroplastics.
Ocean Conservancy uses this image in its promotion of technofix
So "agroplastics" it is going to be, for both good applications (there are a few, if low-volume and local-based) and for consumerism's abuse on a major scale. In the recent Culture Change guest-editorial against agrofuels (link below) the salient point about terms is made by author Kay Weir:
Third world peoples suffering the effects of the “biofuel” boom say the word “biofuels” is incorrect. Peasants have used biofuels (life-energy) for thousands of years and as small-scale fuel production integrated with food production for use in household and local energy supplies. Large-scale fuel production for export demand with huge plantations of monocrops is not biofuel but agrofuel, using oil-based pesticides and fertilisers, exactly like industrial agriculture. It’s widely known that industrial agriculture is a major contributor to climate change."
Captain Charles Moore, who discovered the floating plastic plague in the Northern Pacific Ocean little more than a decade ago, told Culture Change "The corn based PLA plastic is definitely a problem for the ocean; although it will biodegrade in my compost pile, it requires heat which doesn't exist in the ocean. There are, however, bioplastics that will degrade in ocean water, such as PHA by Metabolix and the starch trash bags by Biobag. Metabolix will be marketing agricultural film soon which will be a boon."
Capt. Charles Moore - photo by Jonathan Alcorn
Capt. Moore was responding to our article "Downplaying Plastic Trash in the Ocean (Conservancy)" from March 12, 2009. He had participated in it with a comment on the trash clean-up program by wealthy nonprofit Ocean Conservancy. As part of his response he sent me a recent science article on bioplastics (posted below) that quotes him. After reading this fascinating and revealing tour de force I wrote back to him,
I learned a lot. I admire the stand you took and the fact that it could get into a scientific journal.
I should see more articles that address the preponderance of non-100% biodegradable bioplastics and also the partial petroleum content of (most?) bioplastics. Can trade groups be trusted? Anti-bag ban types seemed to be exaggerating what they told me about petroleum content.
What society has to figure out is the appropriate use of land for bioplastic crops which presently depend on petroleum and tilling, both being unsustainable and climate-killers. Of course we wish plastics that truly biodegrade would prevail in the market place or become mandated by government fiat, but a phase-in could be long and damaging. One must question the alleged need for the products of plastic and bioplastic by a huge population. Maybe the Depression will take care of the problem of consumption far more than activism and science. I see big changes ahead, but can't say when -- at some point with fewer people and lower per capita consumption, the idea of "green consuming" sounds more realistic. Meanwhile I want to be most effective for the oceans and as always look to your guidance.
With the Depression now intensifying, threatening the consumer economy responsible for disposable plasticjunk, not only could the rise of agroplastics not become a major issue; fields will be needed anyway for growing food and becoming grasslands for the buffalo, for example, in what is now Corn Country.
Chemistry & Biology (Elsevier LTD)
Innovations Biobased Performance Bioplastic: Mirel
January 30, 2009
By Barry E. DiGregorio
While none of the bioplastic resins on the market today meets the
need for every petroleum-based product made, the race is on. [pullquote]
Each year over 140 million tons of petroleum-
based polymers are produced worldwide
and used in the production of such
plastics as polyethylene, polystyrene, polyvinyl
chloride, polyurethane, and others.
Mostly using oil, coal, and natural gas
as raw materials for their manufacturing,
these plastics are common in every facet
of our lives from the pharmaceutical
industry to household use. Approximately
10% of all the oil and gas that the United
States produces and imports is used in
the production of synthetic plastics, and
the market is expected to grow at a rate
of up to 15% per year. While these products
hold up well to our fast-paced, throwaway
society, disposed plastic materials
can remain in the environment for up to
2,000 years and longer. In 2005, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
stated that of the 4.4 million tons of
synthetic plastics discarded in the United
States, only 5.7% was recovered and recycled,
with the rest ending up in landfills,
lakes, and oceans. This statistic highlights
the need for a renewable, all-natural
replacement for petroleum-based plastics.
In July 2007, Metabolix Inc., of Cambridge,
MA, first test marketed its fully
biodegradable performance bioplastic,
Mirel, to 129 Target Corporation department
store chains across the United
States. Mirel is a product of corn sugar
fermentation with proprietary genetically
engineered bacteria. ‘‘The Target gift
card can completely biodegrade in
a home compost in about 40 days,’’ says
Brian Igoe, vice president and chief brand
officer at Metabolix. The name Mirel is
meant to imply ‘‘miracle of nature.’’ When
asked about details on the process Metabolix
uses to derive over 80% dry weight
in bioplastic polymers, polyhydroxyalkanoates
(PHAs) from its fermentation
process, Oliver Peoples, Ph.D., Metabolix
cofounder and chief scientific officer responded,
‘‘We don’t disclose how long
the process takes from start to finish, but
I can describe the steps involved: we
feed corn sugar to our engineered
microbes inside fermentation tanks. The
microbes then convert the corn sugar
into complete bioplastic polymers within
the cells. This is the way the microbes
store energy, just as humans store fat.
We then extract the Mirel and turn it into
resin pellets.’’ The biggest selling point
for Mirel, though, is that it is a fully biodegradable
biopolymer.
A Short History of Bioplastics
French chemist and bacteriologist
Maurice Lemoigne first discovered that
Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus megaterium
produced an intracellular biopolyester,
polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), while
working at the Lille branch of the Pasteur
Institute in 1926. Today, PHBs are recognized
as one of the most commonly
derived forms of polyhydroxyalkanoate
(PHA). Since then, over 100 PHAs have
been identified from a wide range of
microorganisms found in the environment.
Lemoigne’s discovery, however,
would have to wait for nearly 55 years
before it would become fully appreciated.
It wasn’t until the 1980s that chemists
and biologists began to seriously consider
petroleum-based plastics as a grosswaste
product problem. An intensive search
began to look for new ways to make them
degrade in municipal and industrial waste
facilities. This experimentation period led
to the discovery that chemical additives
and certain strains of genetically altered
microorganisms could help accelerate the
breakdown of petroleum-based plastics
to a limited extent. Additionally, it became
apparent that the biobased bioplastic
material, like polylactic acid (PLA), could
be derived from the microbial fermentation
of natural substrates such as starch and
oils. Each of these bioplastics had their
own properties that made them useable
in various fields, such as medicine, automobile
manufacturing, packaging, and
others. The most significant aspect of
bioplastics was that they could be made
from entirely renewable resources.
It was during this experimental time
period in polymer science history that
Peoples, then molecular biologist from
the University of Aberdeen in Scotland,
came to the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology as a research scientist to
work on the genetic engineering of microorganisms
that make bioplastics. He
and an MIT colleague, Anthony Sinskey,
Sc.D., successfully isolated the first
enzyme in the biological process to make
bioplastic, a thiolase. ‘‘In the mid-to-late
1980s, we found the genes needed to
make bioplastic, and we filed the first
patent applications in 1987,’’ Peoples
said. However, the patent applications
did not issue until 1993, one year after
Peoples and Sinskey founded Metabolix,
Inc.,a bioscience company, they conceived
as an answer to renewable and sustainable
solutions for petroleum-based plastics.
‘‘From there it took a few years to develop
the first generation of commercial PHA producing
strains,’’ he explained.
In 1990, the British company Imperial
Chemical Industries (ICI) developed a
bioplastic called Biopol made from PHB
that once buried in soil, was broken down
by microorganisms in a matter of a few
months. This led to a bioplastic revolution,
resulting in a number of large-name
companies such as Du Pont, Proctor
and Gamble, and Exxon all joining the
hunt. Although numerous attempts were
made to make the production of new
bioplastics economical, the cost was not
able to compete with petroleum-based
plastics. In addition, the stability and
quality of the bioplastics were combined
with their biodegradability. Problems with
the term ‘‘biodegradable’’ prompted the
American Society for Testing of Materials
(ASTM) and the International Standards
Organization (ISO) to come up with an
official definition for biodegradable as
follows: ‘‘capable of undergoing decomposition
into carbon dioxide, methane,
water, inorganic compounds, or biomass
in which the predominant mechanism is
the enzymatic action of microorganisms,
that can be measured by standard tests
in a specified period of time, reflecting
available disposal condition’’ (www.astm.org).
Usually, before a company introduces
a new bioplastic resin (as pellets) to the
commercial market, an independent life
cycle assessment (LCA) report is ordered
to examine the impact on the potential of
the bioplastic to replace petroleum-based
plastics. Prospective buyers of the bioplastics
can read the LCAs and identify
the products with superior properties.
To assess the LCA of Metabolix’s new
biopolymer Mirel, Bruce Dale, Ph.D.,
a professor of Chemical Engineering and
former chair of the Department of Chemical
Engineering and Materials Science at
Michigan State University was hired to
assess the LCA of Mirel. His conclusions,
based on a case study, were that ‘‘Mirel
can provide 200% reduction in greenhouse
gas emissions along with an over
a 95% reduction in the use of nonrenewable
energy as compared to petroleumbased
plastics’’ (Kim and Dale, 2008).
While none of the bioplastic resins on
the market today meets the need for every
petroleum-based plastic product made,
the race is on to see what company can
make the most useful, economical, and
fully biodegradable bioplastic. While bioplastics
such as PLA are compostable,
they are not fully biodegradable.
For PLA or any bioplastic to be considered
fully biodegradable, it would have to
be able to biodegrade in the marine environment.
According to a recent article
(Moore, 2008), the world’s oceans and
sea life are threatened by the enormous
amounts of plastics they contain. The
author of the paper, Charles James
Moore, the founder of the Algalita Marine
Research Foundation in Long Beach, CA,
says, ‘‘Estimates of plastics in the world’s
oceans exceed over 100 million tons and
in the Central North Pacific Gyre, pieces
of plastic outweigh surface zooplankton
by a factor of 6 to 1.’’ On the subject of
bioplastics, he added, ‘‘Initial composting
studies have shown a slight diminution in
metabolic rate of compost organisms
when PLA was added. This could be interpreted
as PLA being slightly toxic. PHA is
superior because it has been shown to
meet the ASTM standard for biodegradability
in the marine environment, whereas
PLA might remain for up to a thousand
years. However, I am against all landbased
products and activities adding
nutrients to the marine environment,
which is already on its way to eutrophication
in urban and agricultural coastal areas
worldwide.’’
In 2006, Metabolix formed an alliance
with the Archer Daniels Midland Company
(ADM) and announced that they will begin
to produce 110 million pounds of commercial
grade Mirel annually starting in the
second quarter of 2009, through a joint
venture they call Telles, a name derived
from an ancient Roman earth goddess,
Tellus. ADM is known for working with
farmers and processing the crops to
make food ingredients, animal feed ingredients,
renewable fuels, and naturally
derived alternatives to industrial chemicals.
The new state-of-the-art bioplastic
microbial fermentation facility is nearing
completion in Clinton, IA. The facility is
conveniently located adjacent to ADM’s
wet corn milling plant, where the corn will
be separated into grain, starches and
sugars, allowing Metabolix to pipe in the
corn sugar component for the fermentation
process in its bioreactor factory.
Can Bioplastics Be Competitive
during a Recession?
The big question facing all companies
making biopolymer products is if they
can weather the economic storm during
the current challenging time period. At
this time, Metabolix is selling Mirel pellets
at $2.25 per pound, which is three times
higher than the price of polypropylene.
Metabolix’s Brian Igoe says, ‘‘We don’t
compete on price for market share
because we’re positioned as a premium
product with premium environmental
attributes. It’s especially applicable for
the packaging of high-end products such
as cosmetics, or for applications such as
agricultural mulch film that can be tilled
into the soil to eliminate waste while saving
farms retrieval and disposal costs.’’
Thus, only time will tell if the Mirel proposition
holds up.
REFERENCES
Kim, S., and Dale, B.E. (2008). Environ. Sci.
Technol. 42, 7690–7695.
Moore, C.J. (2008). Environ. Res. 108, 131–139.
Barry E. DiGregorio (barry.dig "at" verizon "dot" net) is a science writer based in Middleport, New York.
Chemistry & Biology 16, Elsevier Ltd.
* * * * *
"Peak Soil: Why cellulosic ethanol, biofuels are unsustainable and a threat to America" by Alice Friedemann, 11 April 2007: Peak Soil
"Downplaying Plastic Trash in the Ocean (Conservancy)" by Jan Lundberg, 12 March 2009: Downplaying Plastic Trash
"Plastic bags consumed this year: 112,239,119,401" - as of March 23, 2009, 11:24 PM West Coast U.S. time. For ticker stat and Newsroom Blog go to
Reusable Bags
This essay is Culture Change Letter #243
Activists are a threatened species, but there's safety in numbers. If you can't be active, please $upport your local Earth activist.
This article and graphics are published under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. See the Fair Use Notice for more information.
Culture Change mailing address: P.O. Box 3387, Santa Cruz, California, 95063, USA, Telephone 1-215-243-3144 (and fax). Culture Change was founded by Sustainable Energy Institute (formerly Fossil Fuels Policy Action), a nonprofit organization.
Some articles are published under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. See Fair Use Notice for more information.