Downplaying Plastic Trash in the Ocean (Conservancy)
by Jan Lundberg
12 March 2009
Culture Change Letter #241 - A widely reported story on ocean trash cites the huge Ocean Conservancy group. The group's new report misleads, in that it avoids concluding that the trash
problem facing the ocean is overwhelmingly one of plastic.
Trash that biodegrades is hardly a problem compared to the non-biodegradable plastic from petroleum.
Almost all plastic is petroleum based, sometimes with
added poisons such as heavy metals or even radioactive materials. Non-petroleum plastic from plants is on a very small
scale and is not the biodegradable-friendly substance advertised, in
almost every case.
Petroleum needs to be boycotted. This starts to get at the lifestyle
issue that leads to the destruction of the oceans (and our air and
soil and bodies). Addressing plastic -- a new substance in human history, that we can live without -- is a great way to start dealing with petroleum on which modern society is entirely, perilously dependent.
Plastic on Kamilo Beach [photo courtesy Algalita]
In the news article, titled "Tidal wave of trash threatens world oceans" by Reuters, the statements made by Ocean Conservancy (with lack of follow up by
Reuters) allow us to think that all we
have to do is put our trash in the bins and do our recycling in order to
save the oceans.
When it comes to fundamental disorders, we don’t expect corporate media or mainstream-funded
environmental organizations to mention the fact that there are too
many people. But until societies deal with population growth and
overpopulation, the oceans and ourselves are cooked. Meanwhile, since petroleum has been feeding the growing populations, and plastic is a petroleum product, let's get real.
I asked Captain Charles Moore, founder of Algalita Marine Research
Foundation, who discovered the Garbage Patches in the northern Pacific
Ocean about Ocean Conservancy and its de-emphasizing plastic. His answer: “The Ocean Conservancy
gets its bags for the cleanup donated by the plastics industry, and
they are careful not to be critical of it.”
Charles Moore [photo by Rick Rickman]
Maybe this has something to do with the Ocean Conservancy’s clearing over
$18 million in revenue (2007 financial report). The sources of funds were
not listed. CEO Vikki N. Spruill was paid $200,000. Ocean Conservancy
does have a lot of protection programs according to the website, and
maybe we’d all be lost without their work. However, in Culture Change's two decades of activism, we've found that compromise often holds back the environmental movement.
Algalita through its flagship research vessel the Alguita has
discovered, to everyone’s dismay, is that it is impossible to ever
clean the plastic up or remove it from the oceans due to the fine breakdown of plastic and the magnitude of the problem. This means our only realistic course is to
cut plastic off at the source: industrial society’s producing and consuming
it. This means doing it now, which the Ocean Conservancy might agree
(even if privately) would be nice. Cleaning up a beaches is important,
but most of the plastic remains swirling in the oceans, such as the
clockwise gyre current comprising most of the northern Pacific.
Plastic soup found in ocean [Algalita Marine Research Foundation]
Aside from identifying plastic bags, the Ocean Conservancy's new report and the website avoid
the use of the word “plastic,” leading one away from the realization
that we are dealing foremost with a plastic disaster more than a trash
issue. One reason for this spin is that the Ocean Conservancy is in favor of
bioplastic -- the mono-crop high-petroleum method of growing plants for plastic. Not only is land needed for growing food and for wildlife
habitat instead, bioplastics are not very biodegrable: they need perfect
conditions for that, and their content can be as high as 75%
petroleum plastic. A feature of the Ocean Conservancy's report is “Seek better technological
solutions to debris management and reduction” -- with a photo of a
cornfield and a plastic bottle. Hello?
Rather than simply trash a trash report, we advocate effective action:
1) agitate for bans of plastic grocery bags (or place fees on them),
2) ban other plastics such as bisphenol-A and PVC, and
3) cease the purchase of plastics and petroleum in general.
The ramifications of the last item above will be as massive and ecologically healthy as the current Depression's effects to decrease exports from China -- down a whopping 26% in February.
Tidal wave of trash threatens world oceans
March 10, 2009
MIAMI (Reuters) - A tidal wave of man-made trash is threatening world
oceans, damaging wildlife, tourism and seafood industries and piling
additional stress on seas already hit by climate change,
conservationists said on Tuesday.
A report by U.S.-based Ocean Conservancy detailed what it called a
"global snapshot of marine debris" based on itemized records of
rubbish collected by nearly 400,000 volunteers in 104 countries and
places in a single day in September 2008.
Close to 7 million pounds (3.2 million kg) of trash -- the weight of
18 blue whales -- was collected from oceans, lakes, rivers and
waterways in the 2008 cleanup, the group said in its report "A Rising
Tide of Ocean Debris and What We Can Do About It".
It warned of a "tidal wave of ocean debris," calling it a major
pollution problem of the 21st century.
Topping the list of the 11.4 million items of trash collected were
cigarette butts, plastic bags, and food wrappers and containers. In
the Philippines alone, 11,077 diapers were picked up and 19,504
fishing nets were recovered in Britain.
"Our ocean is sick, and our actions have made it so," Vikki Spruill,
president and chief executive of Ocean Conservancy, said in a
statement accompanying the report.
"We simply cannot continue to put our trash in the ocean. The evidence
turns up every day in dead and injured marine life, littered beaches
that discourage tourists, and choked ocean ecosystems," she said.
"By changing behaviors and policies, individuals, companies, and
governments can help improve the health of our ocean, the Earth's life
support system."
The full report, including a country-by-country Marine Debris Index,
was published at www.oceanconservancy.org.
ANIMALS KILLED, TOURISM HURT
Detailing how refuse poisoned oceans and waterways, the report said
the waste entered the food chain, injured beachgoers and weakened
economies by sapping precious dollars from tourism and seafood
industries.
Thousands of animals, including marine mammals, sea turtles, seabirds
and others, choked or were poisoned each year by eating trash, or
drowned when they became entangled in bags, ropes and old fishing gear.
The 2008 cleanup volunteers found 443 animals entangled or trapped by
marine debris, releasing 268 alive.
"Keeping our ocean free of trash is one of the easiest ways we can
help improve the ocean's resilience as it tries to adapt to the
harmful effects of climate change such as melting ice, rising sea
levels, and changing ocean chemistry," Ocean Conservancy said.
It recommended public and private partnerships to monitor and reduce
marine trash and increased funding for research on the problem. A
policy of "reduce, reuse, recycle" would help lower trash levels,
combined with technological solutions.
"Trash doesn't fall from the sky, it falls from our hands," Spruill
said. "Humans have created the problem of marine debris, and humans
should step up and solve it."
Ocean Conservancy said its next International Coastal Cleanup would be
held around the world on September 19.
(Reporting by Pascal Fletcher; Editing by Jim Loney and John
O'Callaghan)
"A Rising Tide of Ocean Debris and
What We Can Do About It"
* The Marine Debris Index: The Annual Country-by-Country, State-by-State Breakdown of Trash in Our Ocean and Waterways
* Marine Debris Impacts on Water, Wildlife, and Climate Change
* Key Findings and Recommendations
Culture Change mailing address: P.O. Box 3387, Santa Cruz, California, 95063, USA, Telephone 1-215-243-3144 (and fax). Culture Change was founded by Sustainable Energy Institute (formerly Fossil Fuels Policy Action), a nonprofit organization.
Some articles are published under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. See Fair Use Notice for more information.