HomeNews/Essays Living now, naturally and sustainably via relocalizing
Living now, naturally and sustainably via relocalizing
by Dave Ewoldt
25 January 2009
“It is not a sign of good health to be well-adjusted to a sick
society.” -- J. Krishnamurti
Answering the question of how to live our lives right now, in the
face of global crises that cause stress and depression in all those
not living in outright denial, is the new global imperative. But to
deal with this question we must come to terms with what has caused it
to be asked in the first place if we truly desire to formulate an
effective and satisfying answer.
Many thinkers in the physical and biological sciences are starting to
agree with environmental and social justice activists who point out
with increasing frequency that the root of our systemic global and
personal crises lies in our disconnection from the natural world, and
in the culture that creates. This culture is entirely dependent upon
unhealthy, exploitive relationships based on this disconnection.
Our response is to create a sustainable future based on ecological
wisdom and social justice. This goal carries with it a realization
not pointed out often enough: that the culture we have now is not
sustainable. Additionally, if lasting change is desired, it must be
systemic. The problems require more than band-aids on symptoms.
Applying single issue band-aids may alleviate immediate pain and
suffering, but will not keep them from recurring. Further, as the
root of global crises grows stronger, the symptoms will occur more
frequently, in more places, and will be of increasingly greater
destructive magnitude. It’s long past time to quit clipping branches
and to put some concerted effort into digging out the diseased root
from which industrial civilization has grown.
The systemic root of our disconnection from nature can be directly
traced to the dominator paradigm which started conquering and
subverting egalitarian cultures 6-8,000 years ago, and was firmly
ensconced by 2,000 BC. As detailed by author Riane Eisler, this
paradigm consists of force-based ranking hierarchies of control
(humans over nature, men over women, one race over another) that are
built on and maintained by fear. The individual is seen as more
important than the group, and anything outside of the ego is seen as
other. This other is automatically assumed to be inferior or lesser,
and thus morally acceptable to exploit for personal benefit. We end
up seeing ourselves as separate from and able to control the natural
world, our own inner nature, and all the rest of our relationships.
In fact, we assume we must exert this control in order to assure our
prosperity and to further human progress.
The dominator paradigm has led to what I call the Triumvirate of
Collapse. This consists of Peak Oil, which is the end of increasing
supplies of cheap and abundant fossil fuels and the economy which
depends on them to power the Industrial Growth Society; Catastrophic
Climate Destabilization (commonly known as global warming), which is
causing the collapse of global ecosystems and shifting habitation for
flora and fauna due to the abuse of the biosphere from burning fossil
fuels, deforestation, and toxic pollution of the air, lands and
oceans; and Corporatism, which is the loss of our sovereignty to a
merger of state and corporate power. It is financed by the debt-
based usury system of central banks and enforced by national
militaries and police to control dwindling resources. The purpose
seems to be to protect affluent lifestyles where overconsumption is
taken as an entitlement.
It is also important in laying this groundwork for change to come to
an agreement of what we mean by sustainability. This is important
both to ensure we're heading in the right direction, and to ensure we
have a way to measure our success. I derived the following definition
of sustainability from what experts in the field of sustainability
around the globe have been using for decades, and I boiled down the
commonalities of the different definitions into three clauses. This
comprehensive definition can then be used to evaluate decisions and
policies for their adherence to the stated goal of a sustainable
future; to see if proposals are merely (sometimes necessary) holding
actions; or to see if they actually support the status quo that we
must implement an alternative to.
Sustainability is: integrating our social and economic lives into the
environment in ways that tend to enhance or maintain ecosystems
rather than degrade or destroy them; a moral imperative to pass on
our natural inheritance, not necessarily unchanged, but undiminished
in its ability to meet the needs of future generations; finding, and
staying within, the balance point amongst population, consumption,
and waste assimilation where bioregions, watersheds and ecosystems
maintain their ability to recharge and regenerate.
With the above foundation, if we’re willing to admit that the root of
our systemic crises is our fundamental personal and cultural
disconnection from nature, one common sense starting point in
creating an effective antidote for global and personal ills would be
to reconnect with nature. I must also explicitly point out here
(since so many people seem to have forgotten) that humans are an
aspect of the natural world. Our reconnection to nature, in order to
be systemic, must be not only to the environment, but also be to each
other, our communities, as well as reconnecting the culturally
imposed split -- through both science and religion -- amongst body,
mind, and spirit.
Fortunately, reconnecting to nature turns out to be rather easy to do
for anyone who is open to experiencing the process. This process
comes from the field of applied ecopsychology, called the Natural
Systems Thinking Process (NSTP). It can be easily learned and
taught. The NSTP was developed by environmental educator and
psychologist, Dr. Michael J. Cohen, founder of the Audubon Society's
Expedition Institute and Project NatureConnect. The latter is the
graduate department in applied ecopsychology for the Institute of
Global Education, a special NGO consultant to UNESCO.
The NSTP -- which leads to improved personal, social, and
environmental health and well-being -- works by consciously and
sensuously reconnecting all 53 of our senses to their roots in the
natural world. All of our senses have evolved with natural
expectations for fulfillment, and this fulfillment can be met by
learning to follow and trust our natural attractions in the moment. A
short example of this is when our sense of thirst makes itself known,
we are attracted to water. When we satisfy this sense, our life is
supported and we are rewarded with good feelings. Our sense of thirst
is just as real as the water itself. As a natural system with its own
cycles, when our bodies are done with the water, our sense of
excretion makes itself known, and satisfying this sense also makes us
feel good. Our natural attractions are informing us of how we can
gain support in the moment if we trust them. Other senses that we
share with the natural world include our senses of community, love,
color, form, motion, temperature, and acceptance.
Attractions that we might consider to be negative, such as physical
or emotional pain or fear, are nature's way of informing us we don't
have support in the moment, and we should be seeking more positive
attractions elsewhere. Nature supplies an abundance to any species to
meet their needs as long as they remain within the carrying capacity
of their ecosystem. As a foretaste of where I’m heading with this
line of reasoning, this is just the opposite of the scarcity model
that orthodox growth economics relies upon.
Where industrialized humans get into trouble is when we allow
ourselves to get dangerously out of balance by letting only one or
two senses, such as our senses of rationality and language, assume
they are the only ones that matter -- that our intuitive and
emotional senses will lead us astray or make us appear foolish.
Another common problem is finding and clinging to addictive
substitutes for our natural senses, such as substituting television
for our natural sense of creativity, trying to use materialism as a
substitute for emotional and spiritual health and well-being, and
relying on prescription or recreational drugs, or psychotherapy and
self-help programs as a substitute for healthy, mutually-supportive
relationships. As J. Krishnamurti said, “It is not a sign of good
health to be well-adjusted to a sick society.”
In the human built environment and in the social institutions we
create, the process to become sustainable -- to holistically
integrate our activities with the natural world -- is provided by a
systemic concept known as relocalization. This is the antithesis as
well as the antidote to corporate globalization. Relocalization
includes the concepts that we must rebuild our local economies to be
self-reliant; recapture our sense of place and belonging; reclaim our
sovereignty; and restore our communities of mutual support.
Relocalization entails a return to local autonomy within bioregional
networks of interdependence; the production and distribution of
renewable and non-toxic food, goods, services, and energy as close to
the point of consumption as possible; and provides an antidote to the
economic cannibalism of global growth, through the creation of steady-
state local living economies. What provides more than mere hope that
this process can actually be effective is that at its very core
relocalization is based on the way that nature works. Which means the
way that we work when not being manipulated and exploited by nothing
more than stories that benefit someone else.
Healthy ecosystems can be looked to for providing the models and
metaphors humans require for becoming sustainable and creating
mutually supportive relationships. All living organisms have the
tendency to self-organize into mutually supportive attraction
relationships. This can be said to be the prime activity of life; it
creates the web of life which functions to create more life and
diversity. Using the four core Natural Systems Principles -- mutual
support and reciprocity, no waste, no greed, and increasing diversity --
to inform the process of relocalization, we can replace the dominator
paradigm with a paradigm of partnership, and we can overcome and heal
our disconnection and separation from the web of life. But as a quick
side note, also explicit in maintaining adherence to these principles
is the requirement to begin dealing honestly with the global
overpopulation problem.
Reconnecting and relocalizing. These are effective strategies that we
can implement right now that are not merely reshuffling deck chairs
on the Titanic. These strategies require neither a new techno-miracle
to appear nor an evolutionary shift in consciousness to occur. We can
do this because these twin strategies are based on the same natural
systems principles that ecosystems use to stay healthy, vibrant, and
resilient.
Once we do more than rationally understand, but also sensuously
experience our connection to the rest of the natural world, we begin
to enjoy increased physical and mental well-being, improved social
relationships, and benefit from the abundance of natural fulfillment.
This is a natural and intimate aspect of who we really are, and can
be used to blaze the path to a future where we all have the
opportunities to realize our full potential for living now --
naturally and sustainably.
Dave Ewoldt is a co-founder and Executive Director of Natural Systems
Solutions, and he is a counselor in ecopsychology. He is a published
systems theorist and passionate advocate for relocalization. His
book-in-progress is titled Connecting the Dots: Reversing Our
Handbasket to Hell. E-mail:
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Website:
www.attractionretreat.org
Culture Change mailing address: P.O. Box 3387, Santa Cruz, California, 95063, USA, Telephone 1-215-243-3144 (and fax). Culture Change was founded by Sustainable Energy Institute (formerly Fossil Fuels Policy Action), a nonprofit organization.
Some articles are published under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. See Fair Use Notice for more information.