HomeEco-Activism Why Sept. 29 deadline is so meaningful re cell tower proliferation
Why Sept. 29 deadline is so meaningful re cell tower proliferation
by Jan Lundberg
18 September 2008
Our activist alert and Culture Change update of Sept. 18 to our subscribers:
Subject: Why Sept. 29 deadline is so meaningful re cell tower proliferation
From: "Culture Change"
Date: Thu, September 18, 2008 7:44 pm
The following very disturbing alert is from Libby Kelley regarding cell
phone towers rammed down our throats nationwide. In case you did not see
our article/alert and interview with her last week, please see
Growing Concern about Electromagnetic Pollution and Cell Phones
Following the below alert is Culture Change commentary and updates, with
retrospective on brave (and sometimes fallen) tree-sitters. - Jan
Lundberg, editor
Sept. 29 DEADLINE - What We're Up Against:
FYI -
- If you had any doubt as to whether the FCC needs to hear comment
from ordinary citizens about the Cellular Telephone Industries
Association (CTIA) Petition to remove more local zoning authority
for antenna sites, the comments below from Commissioner Adelstein
will convince you that your comment is crucial. He ignores the
intent of Congress in the TCA of 1996 that chose to preserve the
major aspects of local and state authority to decide what sites
are appropriate through the democratic process at the local level.
- In the Communications Daily article below, FCC Commissioner
Adelstein, one of the two Democrats on the Commission, dismisses
citizen participation in local zoning proceedings as "NIMBY". His
comment on the science shows his own "misconception" about the
weight of evidence in the published science.
- Thank you to all of you who have already sent your comment and who
have forwarded the earlier message to your neighbors and local
government officers.
Here's the link again for those who still need to send in their
comment:
Submit your Comment by filling in a form on the FCC webpage
fjallfoss.fcc.gov
by September 29, 2008.
In Box 1. "Proceeding" - type 08-165. Fill out the rest of the form as it
applies to you as an individual. For Box 12 choose COMMENT. You can
attach your Comment as a PDF document, or you can type your comment
directly into the box at the bottom of that page.
Communications Daily:Adelstein Favors Limit on Local Cell-Tower Review
SAN FRANCISCO -- FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein praised a CTIA
request that the agency put a deadline on local rulings about building or
adding to cell towers (CD Aug 28 p5). "The CTIA position is the start of a
federal policy but much less heavy-handed" than having the FCC "lay out
every detail" of what's required of localities, he said Wednesday at a
CTIA conference: "I think it's an intriguing framework."
A nationwide backlog of 700 tower applications dating back more than a
year reflects "unreasonable delays," Adelstein said. Tower foes are "the
same people who are mad when a call gets dropped or they don't get
wireless broadband," he said. "It's the old NIMBY [not in my back yard]
problem." Exceptions would be needed to a "shot clock" for cases involving
special environmental or historical considerations, Adelstein said. But he
can't believe that legitimate "special circumstances" have delayed those
hundreds of longstanding filings, he said. Nor has he decided on remedies
for violations, including a CTIA request to "deem granted" filings still
pending when the clock runs out. Adelstein wants the FCC to work with
state and local governments on time limits. Adelstein doesn't doubt
commission authority to limit local governments, he said. "The FCC has a
role here," he said. "The congressional policy" expressed in
Communications Act Section 332 is "we need to move this forward," and, as
a commissioner, he is bound to carry that out, he said. The FCC can decide
that "the presumption has to be" that a local government must "get it done
in a time certain."
Local tower decisions lag because people fear that the structures cause
cancer, said Rod Wright, a former California Assembly member running for
the state Senate from a district in southern Los Angeles County. That
won't change "as long as you have that silence from Washington," instead
of an authoritative statement on towers and health, he said. "Cities
deliberately don't tell you" a siting decision "because they know that's
when you get to go to court," Wright told CTIA executives moderating the
panel discussion.
Many such fears are "misperceptions" and views "not based on facts, not
based on science," Adelstein said. There's "no evidence of a risk to human
health" under FCC radio-frequency limits, he said. State governments may
be able to help dispel myths, Adelstein said. Cities should "allow
collocation" by approving additional antennas on towers as preferable to
new towers, he said. Asked later if he'd be willing to install a cell
tower in his backyard to promote his position, Adelstein said: "I'd love
it. I'd get better service. I can't do it. I'm kind of in a low area."
During the panel Adelstein said setting rules for a new auction of the 700
MHz D block is "front and center on my plate," at least among wireless
matters. The FCC should publicize proposed rules to get suggestions before
they're completed, he said. "We're not finding overwhelming interest in
that band," he said. The rules are "very difficult to get right," he said.
"We may be spending a lot of time on that this week... That's the biggest
regulatory issue before us."
* * * * *
Comment by Culture Change for culture change: Vigilance is crucial,
because with industry influence so great on government we are going to
keep seeing more cancer, birth defects and other disease. Thanks for
taking action. - Jan Lundberg
Updates: (1) I will indeed be attending the upcoming conference put on by
the Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas, in Sacramento (Sept.
21-23; aspo-usa.org).
Thank you one and all for your support to send
me there. One speaker is my old friend and colleague once at Lundberg Survey,
George Baker who is an expert on Mexico's petroleum sector.
(2) Last night I attended the 10th anniversary memorial for David "Gypsy"
Chain, killed by a corporate logger in the redwoods in the presence of my
friends on a mission to peacefully save ancient trees. My heart goes out
the the family. Some of the Berkeley tree-sitters were there, after
seeing the beloved University of California's Memorial Oak Grove
destroyed. One reason I feel strongly about fair treatment for protesters
and tree-sitters in particular is that my own daughter Spring was
dangerously forced down from high in a redwood in 1996 when she was 16.
As soon as the police had her on the ground they put "pain compliance" on
her as well as putting on handcuffs so tightly that it caused nerve damage
(a common practice at least then). Long live the bravery of activists
doing the work for all of us and for future generations. - JL
* * * * *
CULTURE CHANGE
P.O. Box 4347
Arcata, CA 95518 USA
Telephone and fax: 1-215-243-3144
www.culturechange.org
The main reason to keep Culture Change operating is that the current
financial meltdown means we'll need all the tools of sustainability and
resources we can muster, and soon.
Our PayPal button for secure online donating is on the right of this webpage. You can also send a check via
standard mail to the address above. For a tax deduction the check should
be payable "Culture Change/GVI". Thank you.
Pass along the subscription link lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/culturechange to enable a friend to sign up to
receive Culture Change Letters via email.
Culture Change mailing address: P.O. Box 3387, Santa Cruz, California, 95063, USA, Telephone 1-215-243-3144 (and fax). Culture Change was founded by Sustainable Energy Institute (formerly Fossil Fuels Policy Action), a nonprofit organization.
Some articles are published under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. See Fair Use Notice for more information.